Missing TfL evidence and a manufacturer's Euro 6 confirmation (2026)

Case 925027080A / 2025-07-10 / Adjudicator Louise Fisher

Ilford Lane

“TfL has not provided any evidence to demonstrate that there were contraventions of the Scheme”

Louise Fisher

This reference formed part of a group of ULEZ appeals concerning journeys in January 2025. Louise Fisher determined the appeals on the papers after neither party attended the listed video hearing. TfL had not supplied evidence demonstrating that the alleged contraventions occurred, so Fisher found that the appellant had no case to answer.

The decision also recorded manufacturer evidence dated 19 May 2025 stating that the vehicle met Euro 6 standards. That evidence gave nitrogen oxide emissions of 0.0723 g/km and particulate matter emissions of 0.0019 g/km. Fisher introduced this as an additional point after finding that TfL had not proved its case.

The appeals were allowed, with cancellation of the listed penalties and reimbursement of any amounts already paid. This was an adjudicated evidential decision, not an expressly uncontested withdrawal. The primary finding was the absence of TfL's evidence; the manufacturer confirmation was additional support, not a ruling that every vehicle of the same age or model was compliant.

Source and case reference

Use case reference 925027080A in the London Tribunals register to find the official decision. This commentary distinguishes the adjudicator's finding from a possible argument in a different case; previous tribunal decisions do not bind another adjudicator.