Priority signs and road narrowing appeals
Code 37 PCN Appeal: Failing to Give Way to Oncoming Vehicles
Received a Code 37 PCN at a road narrowing? The priority sign, your view of approaching traffic and the positions of both vehicles matter. Parking Mate UK checks the full CCTV sequence and sign evidence, then prepares and submits your formal representation.
Start with a free Code 37 assessment. Our £9.99 Automated Penalty Charge Appeal Service includes preparing and submitting your formal representation and tribunal appeal.
Check Your PCN
1. What does contravention Code 37 mean?
Code 37 means that your vehicle is alleged to have failed to give priority to traffic coming from the opposite direction. It usually concerns a narrow stretch where vehicles cannot comfortably pass each other and signs tell one approach to give way.
This is a priority restriction, not a ban on using the road. The important question is whether you should have yielded when you proceeded. Review where the oncoming vehicle was, what you could see and how both vehicles moved, rather than relying on a single photograph of your car beyond the sign.
- Contravention
- Code 37: failing to give way to oncoming vehicles
- Typical restriction
- A short road narrowing, bridge or traffic-calming feature where one direction must give priority
- Main evidence
- The priority sign and plate, any give-way line, both vehicles' positions and the complete CCTV sequence
- Penalty amount
- London borough moving-traffic scheme: £160, reduced to £80 during the initial discount period. England outside London: £60 or £70, reduced to £30 or £35, according to the applicable charging band. Follow the notice for other schemes, Wales and the discount deadline.
- Representations
- For a London Code 37 PCN, the authority must receive your representation within 28 days of service of the PCN
- Appeal route
- Formal representations to the issuing authority; after rejection, London Tribunals in London or the Traffic Penalty Tribunal under the relevant schemes elsewhere
2. Which signs apply at a priority narrowing?
Diagram 615 is the red-bordered circular sign with a small red upward arrow on the left and a larger black downward arrow on the right. It tells traffic facing it to give priority to vehicles coming the other way. At the start of the priority section, the accompanying plate says 'Give way to oncoming vehicles', with a distance where appropriate.
The circular sign must have its associated plate. The blue diagram 811A sign faces the opposite approach and tells those drivers that they have priority. The two signs communicate different instructions; a photograph of the blue sign alone does not establish what faced the vehicle receiving the PCN.
A give-way road marking can identify the waiting point but is not compulsory at every narrowing. The triangular upright GIVE WAY sign used at junctions is not the prescribed substitute for diagram 615 at this type of priority section.

3. What must the authority prove?
The evidence must establish the priority instruction facing your approach and the alleged failure to give way. Diagram 615 is enforceable as a traffic sign without an underlying traffic order; the absence of an order alone is not a reason to cancel this allegation.
- The relevant sign and plate: identify what faced the vehicle, where the narrowing began and whether the instruction could be understood from that approach.
- The movement of both vehicles: the recording should show when your vehicle proceeded, where the oncoming vehicle was and its subsequent movement. A short clip starting after entry may omit the disputed decision point.
- The driver's view: compare the elevated camera view with approach photographs. Check foliage, high-sided traffic, sign orientation and the sight line through the narrowing.
- Any give-way line: where one is present, identify the nearer line to the narrowing and both vehicles' positions when it was crossed. Its statutory test concerns likely danger or making the opposing driver change speed or course to avoid an accident.
- Night-time visibility: direct lighting requirements depend on the road speed limit, nearby street lighting and the applicable exceptions. An unlit sign is not automatically defective on every road.
- The notice and liable person: check the registration, recorded journey, allegation and owner or qualifying-hire evidence.
4. Grounds for appealing a Code 37 PCN
Use a ground supported by the recording and documents. A moving oncoming vehicle does not have to collide with yours for a contravention to occur, and saying that nobody stopped is not a complete answer to a failure-to-give-priority allegation.
- The contravention did not occur: use timestamped frames to explain why the oncoming vehicle's position and distance did not require you to wait when you proceeded.
- You had already given way: show the vehicles you allowed through, when you moved and how the next oncoming vehicle approached. Earlier compliance matters only if the later movement was also lawful.
- The sign or plate was missing, obscured or inadequately positioned: provide evidence from your approach at the relevant time, not just a close-up taken beside the sign.
- The recording does not prove the allegation: identify a missing part of the approach, an unseen opposing vehicle or a mismatch between the footage and sign photographs.
- You were not the liable owner, the vehicle was used without consent or a qualifying hire applies: provide the dated documents relevant to that ground.
- The penalty exceeds the amount applicable: compare the amount demanded with the scheme and circumstances on the notice.
5. Exemptions and circumstances that need evidence
The priority sign does not contain a general exemption for residents, deliveries, taxis, motorcycles or Blue Badge holders. A smaller vehicle or a familiar route does not by itself remove the requirement to give way.
Following the vehicle ahead is not an exemption. If a van or bus blocked your view, distinguish a sign that was genuinely hidden from proceeding before you could check for oncoming traffic. The decisions below show why this distinction can change the outcome.
If you rely on a specific legal exception or an instruction given at the scene, identify it and provide the supporting evidence. Urgency, congestion or an unfamiliar route may instead be reasons to ask the authority to exercise discretion. They do not automatically establish a legal ground for cancellation.
[2][13][7]6. How to make a formal representation
For a London Code 37 PCN, submit formal representations to the issuing authority using the details on the notice. London Tribunals states they must be received "within 28 days of the date the Penalty Charge Notice is served".
Outside London, use the submission route and deadline on the notice under the applicable English or Welsh scheme.
- Open the official evidence and challenge portal shown on the PCN. Enter the notice reference and vehicle registration.
- Watch the complete CCTV. Note the sign, any give-way line, the narrowing and the positions of both vehicles before and after you proceeded.
- State the ground and explain the specific issue. Attach timestamped frames, dated approach photographs and any owner or hire documents relevant to your case.
- Identify any missing evidence needed to resolve the point, submit the representation by the deadline and keep the full text, attachments and dated acknowledgement.
Will appealing affect the 50% discount?
The 50% reduction is an early-payment discount, not a discount for making an appeal. Check the reduced amount and payment deadline on your PCN before deciding whether to pay or challenge it. The discount deadline and the deadline for representations are not necessarily the same.
An early challenge may give you another opportunity to pay the discounted amount if it is rejected. Check the issuing authority's policy and the terms of its reply; a renewed discount is not automatic for every notice. Submit through the correct challenge route and keep the dated confirmation.
If you take the case to the tribunal, do not assume the discount remains available. An allowed appeal cancels the penalty. If the appeal is refused, the full penalty is normally payable. Read the rejection and tribunal decision for the payment instructions.
7. How long does the authority have to respond?
London Tribunals states that the authority "should normally respond to representations within 3 months".
For formal representations under England's 2022 regulations outside London, the authority must serve its decision within 56 days of receiving them. Welsh Government guidance also states a 56-day response period under the separate Welsh regulations.
[7][9][8][10]8. Check the Notice of Rejection and evidence
The Notice of Rejection should explain the decision and provide the tribunal appeal instructions. Check whether it addresses your actual point: the position of the oncoming vehicle, your view of the sign or the part of the journey missing from the recording.
Compare the sign photograph dates and camera angle with your own evidence. If the authority relies on another vehicle slowing down, examine when and why that happened. If you raised a missing plate or a lighting issue, check the response against the sign and conditions involved.
Record the date of service and the appeal deadline. Keep the PCN, your representation, acknowledgement, rejection and evidence together, then check the tribunal evidence pack for anything new.
[7][11][13]9. Taking a Code 37 appeal to the tribunal
For a London PCN, register your appeal with London Tribunals within 28 days beginning with service of the Notice of Rejection. Use its verification details, select the relevant ground and explain how the signs, sight line and vehicle sequence support your case.
Outside London, the Traffic Penalty Tribunal handles the relevant English and Welsh schemes. Use the appeal details in the rejection. Both tribunals are independent and normally charge no appeal fee; if the appeal is refused, the full penalty is normally payable.
Organise your evidence as a short sequence: approach, decision point, opposing vehicle and passage through the narrowing. Previous decisions can illustrate the issue, but the adjudicator must decide your appeal on its own evidence.
[7][11][12][13]Recent Code 37 tribunal decisions
Two allowed appeals and one refusal examine the timing of entry, a driver's view and the risk of following another vehicle. Full case details and authority attribution are available in each commentary.
The opposing van was still too far from the narrowing to require waiting
Case 2250483803 / 2025-10-21 / Adjudicator Sean Stanton-Dunne
Sean Stanton-Dunne allowed the appeal after finding that the vehicle had already given way and reached the narrowing while the opposing van was still coming off a mini-roundabout. The distance and sequence did not establish a failure to give priority.
Read the case commentary“I find from the evidence that the alleged contravention did not occur.”
Sean Stanton-Dunne, case 2250483803
The elevated camera view did not establish a conspicuous sign from the driver's position
Case 2250488487 / 2025-10-20 / Adjudicator Martin Hoare
Martin Hoare allowed the appeal because high-sided vehicles obscured the driver's view. Although the enforcement camera could see the priority sign, the adjudicator found that it was not conspicuous from the driver's position in these circumstances.
Read the case commentary“The signage was not adequate in these particular circumstances.”
Martin Hoare, case 2250488487
Following a van did not excuse failing to check for oncoming traffic
Case 2250424214 / 2025-12-29 / Adjudicator Anju Kaler
Anju Kaler refused the appeal after finding that a motorcycle followed a white van which had itself failed to give way. The restriction was properly signed, and an obstructed view did not justify continuing without checking for approaching traffic.
Read the case commentary“If the driver could not see what was going on because his view was obstructed, he should have waited until he could see if there were any oncoming vehicles.”
Anju Kaler, case 2250424214
2025 London Tribunals Code 37 results
18 of 81 recorded cases were allowed (22.2%).
| Recorded outcome | Cases |
|---|---|
| Allowed | 18 |
| Refused | 63 |
| Total | 81 |
Sources and references
- Standard contravention codes
Linked contravention code list, page 2: Code 37, failing to give way to oncoming vehicles; suffix j.
- TSRGD 2016, Schedule 3
Part 2 item 9, diagram 615: Part 4 provisions 1 and 4; Part 5 direction 3; associated plates in Part 3 items 5, 9 and 10. Supplied statutory PDF checked, pages 70 and 76-80; regulation 8 on page 11.
- TSRGD 2016, Schedule 11
Part 2 item 1, diagrams 811A and 811B: priority from the opposite approach and its end.
- Traffic Signs Manual, Chapter 3 (2019)
Paragraph 1.2.6; section 4.8, printed pages 37-38 (PDF pages 39-40), including Figures 4-27 to 4-29. Sign use, plates, sight lines and optional markings.
- TSRGD 2016, Schedule 9
Part 6 item 3, diagram 1003A; Part 7 paragraph 7(c), give-way line before a narrowing. Supplied PDF pages 148 and 164-165.
- London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003
Section 4, Schedule 1 and Schedule 3: sign-based enforcement, owner liability, representations, appeals and scheduled signs.
- London Tribunals: moving-traffic PCN enforcement
Representation receipt within 28 days of PCN service; normal three-month response expectation; 28-day tribunal appeal period after rejection.
- DfT: moving-traffic enforcement outside London
Applies to England; Challenges, representations and appeals: 28-day representation period and 56-day decision period.
- England's 2022 Representations and Appeals Regulations
Regulation 6: qualifying formal representations, decision served within 56 days. Read with DfT statutory guidance; not London's 2003 Act procedure.
- Welsh Government: moving-traffic enforcement guidance
Paragraphs 92-93, PDF page 20: 28-day representations and 56-day decision service under the separate Welsh regulations.
- London Tribunals: preparing your appeal
Evidence and statutory grounds for the independent appeal.
- Traffic Penalty Tribunal: moving-traffic PCNs
Relevant appeal schemes outside London.
- London Tribunals: registers of appeals
Search the linked case references. Statistics use the supplied archive, 2025 decision dates and the exact 'Failing to give way to oncoming vehicles' label.
- London Councils: parking and traffic charges
Minor moving-traffic charge £160 with 50% early-payment reduction. This borough scheme is not a universal amount for every London notice.
- England's 2022 charging guidelines
Schedule 3 paragraphs 1-2: higher-level moving-traffic bands £60 or £70 and 50% discounted amounts. Apply the correct scheme and band.
About Parking Mate UK
We assess real Code 37 decisions to identify the evidence that matters at a priority narrowing: the sign and plate, the driver's sight line and where each vehicle was when the driver proceeded.
Our 2025 failure-to-give-way analysis covers 81 London Tribunals decisions: 18 allowed and 63 refused. These examples help us distinguish a genuine timing or visibility issue from a failure to check for approaching traffic.
Send your Code 37 PCN for a free assessment. Parking Mate UK prepares and submits your formal representation and handles your tribunal appeal, with support online and on WhatsApp.
Check Your PCN