Transport for London / Code 32

TfL Code 32 PCN Appeal: Direction of Travel (2026)

A TfL Code 32 PCN alleges travelling against a mandatory direction or failing to follow a direction sign. We compare the sign facing your approach with the recorded route and the exact Code 32 allegation before preparing your appeal.

Start with a free TfL Code 32 assessment. Our £9.99 Automated Penalty Charge Appeal Service prepares and submits your challenge and handles your tribunal appeal.

Check Your PCN
Illustrated car waiting before a crossroads beside a blue ahead-only arrow beneath a traffic signal
Illustrative Code 32 scenario. The blue upward arrow requires traffic to continue ahead through the junction.

1. What does TfL Code 32 mean?

TfL Code 32 concerns failing to comply with a prescribed direction of travel. The suffix and wording distinguish the alleged movement, such as travelling against the required direction or failing to turn as directed.

Contravention
Code 32: failing to proceed in the direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign
Issuing authority
Transport for London
Formal representation deadline
28 days beginning with service of the PCN.
Appeal route
TfL, then London Tribunals after a formal Notice of Rejection.
Penalty and discount
£160, reduced by 50% to £80 during the applicable discount period.
Appealing during the discount
TfL pauses the discount period when it receives your representation within that period. If rejected, the remaining discount period resumes from the point it was paused.
[1][2][4][9][10]

2. What must TfL establish?

Identify the mandatory arrow or one-way direction applicable to your approach. Check its position, visibility and any lane-specific application against the camera recording; a sign facing another entrance does not establish what your approach conveyed.

Official diagram 606 left, right and ahead-only arrows alongside diagram 609 turn-left-ahead and turn-right-ahead arrows
Official artwork cropped from TSRGD 2016, Schedule 3 Part 2 items 1 and 2. Left: diagram 606 alternatives. Right: diagram 609 alternatives. Crown copyright.
  • The required direction: identify the actual arrow, its position and the junction or road length to which it applies. The PCN and its images should make the alleged failure understandable.
  • The legal restriction: where an order is needed, its operative article, schedule or map must cover the approach and movement alleged. Some roundabout and dual-carriageway arrangements have specific statutory exceptions to the usual order requirement.
  • Sign placement and visibility: check whether the sign faced your approach before you committed to the manoeuvre. For standalone signs, the Manual distinguishes a horizontal junction arrow, an ahead-only sign immediately before the junction and a turn-ahead sign normally placed in advance. There is no universal requirement for two blue signs.
  • Lighting: identify whether the arrow was standalone, bollard-mounted or fixed to traffic signals. Standalone signs have conditional lighting rules; the signal-mounted version has its own internal-lighting requirement. An assessment must use the rule for the actual installation.
  • The complete movement: CCTV should establish the vehicle, junction and direction taken. A still photograph of a vehicle near a sign may not show that it passed or disobeyed it. Compare any older sign photographs with the layout on the incident date.
  • Liability and notice: check the PCN description, date of service and the owner or qualifying hire documents. A vehicle registration alone does not resolve a properly evidenced liability dispute.
[2][3][4][5][6][8][1][15]

3. Grounds and exemptions for a TfL Code 32 appeal

Use only an exception applicable to the sign or restriction, or evidence of an authorised direction. A sat-nav instruction is not permission to ignore a mandatory direction.

  • The camera recording does not show the movement described on the PCN.
  • The relevant direction sign was obscured, not applicable to your lane or not adequately visible before the manoeuvre.
  • The restriction relied on does not cover that approach or movement, or an applicable direction or exemption authorised it.
  • If ownership, hire liability, payment or the amount demanded is disputed, explain the applicable statutory ground and attach the records supporting it.
[6][5][2][8][4][7][15]

4. How to challenge your PCN with TfL

Send your formal representation to TfL within 28 days beginning with service of the Code 32 PCN.

The initial 50% discount runs for 14 days beginning with the date of the PCN. TfL pauses the discount period when it receives your representation within that period. If rejected, the remaining discount period resumes from the point it was paused.

  1. Open TfL's PCN service below using your PCN number and vehicle registration.
  2. Explain the Code 32 ground you rely on. Include evidence of the direction sign, approach lane and manoeuvre recorded by TfL.
  3. Submit in the name of the person or organisation on the notice, including written authorisation where a representative acts for them.
  4. For a postal representation, use Red routes, PO Box 335, Darlington DL1 9PU. Keep a copy and allow time for delivery.
  5. Save your completed submission, attachments and dated acknowledgement.
[13][11]

5. How long does TfL have to respond?

London Tribunals says the authority "should normally respond to representations within 3 months". Keep the acknowledgement showing when TfL received yours.

[11]

6. If TfL rejects your representation

Following a formal rejection, you have 28 days beginning with service to pay or register an appeal with London Tribunals. Use the appeal instructions and verification details supplied with TfL's decision.

[11]

7. Taking your TfL appeal to London Tribunals

Register with the Environment and Traffic Adjudicators at London Tribunals, the independent tribunal for this PCN. Set out your Code 32 grounds and include the notice, your representation and the supporting evidence.

If TfL contests the appeal, review its evidence pack against the direction sign, approach lane and manoeuvre recorded by TfL. Respond to the tribunal's directions by the dates it gives you.

There is no fee to register an appeal. If refused, the full penalty is normally payable; the earlier discount does not automatically continue.

[11][12]

Other TfL notices and appeal routes

This contravention uses the Environment and Traffic Adjudicators route. TfL's ULEZ, LEZ, Congestion Charge and tunnel charging penalties use the separate Road User Charging Adjudicators route.

[16]

TfL Code 32: tribunal examples

These reviewed decisions concern Transport for London and illustrate issues relevant to Code 32. Compare the adjudicator's reasoning with your own evidence; each appeal is decided on its facts.

The PCN did not adequately identify the direction requirement

Transport for LondonAppeal allowed

Case 2250597584 / 2025-12-16 / Adjudicator Edward Houghton

Edward Houghton allowed the appeal because, on the particular facts, the PCN did not adequately explain the grounds for the penalty. Its photographs did not resolve which type of direction sign was alleged to have been contravened.

It is therefore defective and no penalty may be demanded on the basis of it.

Edward Houghton, case 2250597584
Read the case commentary

A clear ahead-only arrow did not need a second no-right-turn sign

Transport for LondonAppeal refused

Case 2250435312 / 2025-12-31 / Adjudicator Teresa Brennan

Teresa Brennan refused the appeal after finding that the blue ahead-only arrow on the traffic lights was clear and visible. CCTV showed a right turn, and the absence of an additional no-right-turn sign did not defeat the allegation.

There is no requirement for an additional no right turn sign.

Teresa Brennan, case 2250435312
Read the case commentary

2025 TfL tribunal results: Mandatory direction signs

62 of 152 recorded cases were allowed (40.8%).

TfL blue-arrow direction allegations; not every possible Code 32 suffix. Transport for London entries in the supplied 2025 ETA register analysis, grouped by allegation wording. Allowed includes uncontested appeals. Blank outcomes and refusals with a recommendation remain separate. These are tribunal cases, not all PCNs or initial representations.
Recorded outcomeCases
Allowed62
Refused90
Total152

Full Code 32 PCN Appeal Guide

Read the detailed legislation, signage requirements, exemptions and case analysis for this contravention.

Read the full Code 32 PCN Appeal Guide

Sources and references

  1. Standard contravention codes

    Linked standard code list: Code 32 and suffixes d/t. Distinguish Code 29 one-way restrictions, Code 38 specified-side signs and Code 50 prohibited turns.

  2. TSRGD 2016, Schedule 3

    Schedule 3 Part 2 items 1 (606) and 2 (609); Part 3 items 1-3; assigned Part 4 provisions 1, 2, 4 and Part 5 directions 1/2. Supplied statutory PDF pages 68-69 and 76-80 checked.

  3. TSRGD 2016, Schedule 14: signs fixed to traffic signals

    Part 2 item 42 (606), Part 4 requirement 10, Part 6 directions 28-29 and paragraph 3(4): signal-mounted arrow, internal lighting, legal restriction and traffic-facing placement. Supplied PDF pages 467, 493, 497 and 500.

  4. Traffic Signs Manual, Chapter 3 (2019)

    Chapter 3 paragraphs 4.2.1-4.2.2, 4.2.11, 4.3.1-4.3.3, 4.5.1-4.5.4 and 4.6.1: compulsory direction signs, permitted plates, siting and roundabout exception.

  5. Local Authorities' Traffic Orders Regulations 1996

    Regulation 18: information about the effect of an order and maintenance of signs.

  6. London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003

    Section 4 and Schedule 1: scheduled section 36 signs, prescribed orders, owner liability, representations and appeals.

  7. London Tribunals: moving-traffic PCN enforcement

    London representations, response expectation and independent appeal stages.

  8. London Tribunals: registers of appeals

    Search the three linked case references. Statistics use the supplied Data-sheet cohort, unique references, 2025 decision dates and exact label 'Fail proceed in direction shown by arrow blue sign'.

  9. London-wide parking and traffic charges

    Current moving-traffic charge: £160, with the applicable 50% early-payment reduction. Borough increases took effect on 7 April 2025.

  10. England's 2022 charging guidelines

    Schedule 3 paragraphs 1-2: higher-level moving-traffic charges, bands of £60 or £70 and their 50% discounted amounts; apply the correct local band.

  11. London Tribunals: moving-traffic enforcement process

    Representations within 28 days of service, normal three-month response and appeal after rejection.

  12. London Tribunals: preparing your appeal

    Registering an appeal, verification details and supporting evidence.

  13. TfL: challenge a Penalty Charge Notice

    Online and postal representations, authority to act and the discount-pause policy.

  14. TfL: red routes and penalty charges

    TfL's road network and the current traffic-enforcement penalty.

  15. TfL: rules of red routes

    Parking, loading, bus lanes, cycle lanes, yellow boxes and prohibited turns on TfL roads.

  16. London Tribunals: registers of appeals

    Separate ETA and RUCA appeal registers.

About Parking Mate UK

For a TfL Code 32 PCN, we focus on the direction sign, approach lane and manoeuvre recorded by TfL. Our assessment combines your notice and evidence with relevant tribunal decisions.

Our 2025 TfL analysis of mandatory direction signs covers 152 cases: 62 allowed and 90 refused. The results section explains the allegation group covered.

Parking Mate UK prepares and submits your challenge to TfL, tracks the response and handles your London Tribunals appeal. Send us your PCN for a free assessment and continue online or on WhatsApp.

Check Your PCN
Illustrated car waiting before a crossroads beside a blue ahead-only arrow beneath a traffic signalExplore our appeal platform
By Parking Mate UK