Transport for London / Code 33

TfL Code 33 PCN Appeal: Restricted Route (2026)

Received a TfL PCN for using a route reserved for buses or other specified vehicles? We check the vehicle classes on the sign, the hours and your recorded route, then prepare and submit your Code 33 challenge.

Start with a free TfL Code 33 assessment. Our £9.99 Automated Penalty Charge Appeal Service prepares and submits your challenge and handles your tribunal appeal.

Check Your PCN
Illustrated car approaching a bus-and-cycle gate with visible blue signs and an alternative side road
Illustrative bus-and-cycle gate. The vehicle symbols on the blue signs identify who may use this route.

1. What does TfL Code 33 mean?

TfL Code 33 alleges using a route restricted to certain vehicles. The sign and any supplementary plate define which vehicles may use it; this is not the same allegation as driving along a conventional bus lane.

Contravention
Code 33: using a route restricted to certain vehicles
Issuing authority
Transport for London
Formal representation deadline
28 days beginning with service of the PCN.
Appeal route
TfL, then London Tribunals after a formal Notice of Rejection.
Penalty and discount
£160, reduced by 50% to £80 during the applicable discount period.
Appealing during the discount
TfL pauses the discount period when it receives your representation within that period. If rejected, the remaining discount period resumes from the point it was paused.
[1][2][3][8][9]

2. What must TfL establish?

Read the permitted vehicle symbols, supplementary wording and operating hours on the approach. Match those permissions to your vehicle and the point where it entered the restricted route.

Official diagram 953 alternatives showing buses, cycles and taxis, including the local-bus variant
Diagram 953 alternatives from TSRGD 2016, Schedule 3 Part 2 item 33. The cycle symbol or taxi wording may be omitted in permitted variants. Crown copyright.
  • Restriction and legal basis: the relevant order or other legal instrument must cover the road length, direction and operating period alleged. Check the operative article, schedule or map and any amendments.
  • Sign placement: TSRGD Schedule 3 Part 5 direction 1 requires the terminal sign to be as near as practicable to where the restriction starts. Traffic Signs Manual paragraph 9.7.2 explains visibility before a driver commits to the turn. The layout determines whether one or two signs adequately inform approaching traffic.
  • Visibility at the time: compare dated approach photographs with the recording. Check signs hidden by foliage, vehicles or street furniture, turned away from traffic, or showing an unreadable time plate.
  • Night-time lighting: Schedule 3 Part 4 paragraph 4 applies to these signs. On roads above 20 mph within 50 metres of qualifying street lighting, its direct-lighting requirements apply subject to the stated conditions and exceptions.
  • Vehicle and movement: the recording must identify the vehicle and show it using the restricted route during its operating period. Check which side of an island or which entry point the vehicle passed.
  • Liability and notice: the PCN must identify the allegation and be addressed to the person liable under the applicable owner or hire provisions.
[2][5][3][6][7][10][4][15]

3. Grounds and exemptions for a TfL Code 33 appeal

Check the exact vehicle classes and exceptions in force at that location. Permission to use a different bus lane or restricted route does not automatically apply here.

  • Your vehicle belonged to a permitted class or a stated exemption covered the journey.
  • The restriction was not operating at the recorded time or did not apply to the route you took.
  • The entry signs did not adequately convey the restriction from your approach.
  • The recording, applicable sign or order does not establish the prohibited use alleged on the PCN.
  • If ownership, hire liability, payment or the amount demanded is disputed, explain the applicable statutory ground and attach the records supporting it.
[6][5][7][2][3][15]

4. How to challenge your PCN with TfL

Send your formal representation to TfL within 28 days beginning with service of the Code 33 PCN.

The initial 50% discount runs for 14 days beginning with the date of the PCN. TfL pauses the discount period when it receives your representation within that period. If rejected, the remaining discount period resumes from the point it was paused.

  1. Open TfL's PCN service below using your PCN number and vehicle registration.
  2. Explain the Code 33 ground you rely on. Include evidence of the route's permitted vehicle classes, operating hours and entry signs.
  3. Submit in the name of the person or organisation on the notice, including written authorisation where a representative acts for them.
  4. For a postal representation, use Red routes, PO Box 335, Darlington DL1 9PU. Keep a copy and allow time for delivery.
  5. Save your completed submission, attachments and dated acknowledgement.
[13][11]

5. How long does TfL have to respond?

London Tribunals says the authority "should normally respond to representations within 3 months". Keep the acknowledgement showing when TfL received yours.

[11]

6. If TfL rejects your representation

Following a formal rejection, you have 28 days beginning with service to pay or register an appeal with London Tribunals. Use the appeal instructions and verification details supplied with TfL's decision.

[11]

7. Taking your TfL appeal to London Tribunals

Register with the Environment and Traffic Adjudicators at London Tribunals, the independent tribunal for this PCN. Set out your Code 33 grounds and include the notice, your representation and the supporting evidence.

If TfL contests the appeal, review its evidence pack against the route's permitted vehicle classes, operating hours and entry signs. Respond to the tribunal's directions by the dates it gives you.

There is no fee to register an appeal. If refused, the full penalty is normally payable; the earlier discount does not automatically continue.

[11][12]

Other TfL notices and appeal routes

This contravention uses the Environment and Traffic Adjudicators route. TfL's ULEZ, LEZ, Congestion Charge and tunnel charging penalties use the separate Road User Charging Adjudicators route.

[16]

Tribunal examples relevant to Code 33

These London Tribunals decisions illustrate issues relevant to Code 33. They involve the authorities named below, not necessarily TfL. Use the reasoning that matches your evidence; these are not TfL-specific outcomes.

Outdated photographs did not establish the signs on the driver's approach

London Borough of EnfieldAppeal allowed

Case 2250427416 / 2025-12-20 / Adjudicator Belinda Pearce

Belinda Pearce allowed the appeal because the photographs did not establish what signs faced this vehicle when the PCN was issued. The 2023 images differed from the signage visible in the 2025 recording.

I am not, therefore, satisfied by the evidence in this Case; no contravention is proved.

Belinda Pearce, case 2250427416
Read the case commentary

The evidence did not establish two distinct bus-gate contraventions

London Borough of Tower HamletsAppeal allowed

Case 2250474573 / 2025-12-18 / Adjudicator Anju Kaler

Anju Kaler allowed the appeal where the authority had not supplied the first recording or clear evidence of the route between two closely timed PCNs. The evidence did not establish that the notices concerned distinct contraventions.

I am not satisfied that these are two distinct contraventions and so I allow this appeal.

Anju Kaler, case 2250474573
Read the case commentary

Clear signs and CCTV established the restricted-route contravention

London Borough of EnfieldAppeal refused

Case 2250427110 / 2025-12-29 / Adjudicator Lola Moses

Lola Moses refused the appeal after accepting the CCTV, signs and site plan. The vehicle had passed the bus-gate signs, and the claimed circumstances did not fall within an exception in the order.

I am satisfied that the signage was substantially compliant, clear, and adequate for a reasonably diligent motorist.

Lola Moses, case 2250427110
Read the case commentary

2025 TfL tribunal results: Routes restricted to certain vehicles

4 of 6 recorded cases were allowed (66.7%).

TfL restricted-route allegation label. Transport for London entries in the supplied 2025 ETA register analysis, grouped by allegation wording. Allowed includes uncontested appeals. Blank outcomes and refusals with a recommendation remain separate. These are tribunal cases, not all PCNs or initial representations.
Recorded outcomeCases
Allowed4
Refused2
Total6

Full Code 33 PCN Appeal Guide

Read the detailed legislation, signage requirements, exemptions and case analysis for this contravention.

Read the full Code 33 PCN Appeal Guide

Sources and references

  1. Standard contravention codes

    Linked code list: Code 33, using a route restricted to certain vehicles. Read the full vehicle-specific allegation.

  2. TSRGD 2016, Schedule 3

    Schedule 3 Part 2 items 33-40: the 953 and tram-route series; Part 4 provisions 1, 4, 7 and 8 where assigned; Part 5 direction 1. Supplied statutory PDF checked.

  3. Traffic Signs Manual, Chapter 3 (2019)

    Chapter 3 paragraphs 9.7.1-9.7.8: permitted signs, visibility, bus gates and optional road marking; section 10.2 for tram routes.

  4. Highway Code: traffic signs

    Blue circular instructions, including buses and cycles only and trams only.

  5. Local Authorities' Traffic Orders Regulations 1996

    Regulation 18: information about the effect of an order and maintenance of signs.

  6. London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003

    Section 4 and Schedule 1: scheduled section 36 signs, prescribed orders, owner liability, representations and appeals.

  7. London Tribunals: registers of appeals

    Search the case references in this guide. Statistics use the supplied Data sheet, 2025 decision dates and the exact restricted-route label.

  8. London-wide parking and traffic charges

    Current moving-traffic charge: £160, with the applicable 50% early-payment reduction. Borough increases took effect on 7 April 2025.

  9. England's 2022 charging guidelines

    Schedule 3 paragraphs 1-2: higher-level moving-traffic charges, bands of £60 or £70 and their 50% discounted amounts; apply the correct local band.

  10. TSRGD 2016, Schedule 9

    Part 6 item 15: diagram 1048.5 BUS GATE road marking. Read with TSM Chapter 3 paragraphs 9.7.6-9.7.8.

  11. London Tribunals: moving-traffic enforcement process

    Representations within 28 days of service, normal three-month response and appeal after rejection.

  12. London Tribunals: preparing your appeal

    Registering an appeal, verification details and supporting evidence.

  13. TfL: challenge a Penalty Charge Notice

    Online and postal representations, authority to act and the discount-pause policy.

  14. TfL: red routes and penalty charges

    TfL's road network and the current traffic-enforcement penalty.

  15. TfL: rules of red routes

    Parking, loading, bus lanes, cycle lanes, yellow boxes and prohibited turns on TfL roads.

  16. London Tribunals: registers of appeals

    Separate ETA and RUCA appeal registers.

About Parking Mate UK

For a TfL Code 33 PCN, we focus on the route's permitted vehicle classes, operating hours and entry signs. Our assessment combines your notice and evidence with relevant tribunal decisions.

Our 2025 TfL analysis of routes restricted to certain vehicles covers 6 cases: 4 allowed and 2 refused. The results section explains the allegation group covered.

Parking Mate UK prepares and submits your challenge to TfL, tracks the response and handles your London Tribunals appeal. Send us your PCN for a free assessment and continue online or on WhatsApp.

Check Your PCN
Illustrated car approaching a bus-and-cycle gate with visible blue signs and an alternative side roadExplore our appeal platform
By Parking Mate UK