Transport for London / Code 52

TfL Code 52 PCN Appeal: Restricted Vehicles (2026)

Received a TfL Code 52 PCN? The vehicle restriction matters: a goods-vehicle prohibition and a no-motor-vehicles sign are different allegations. We check the sign, vehicle class and recorded journey, then prepare your appeal.

Start with a free TfL Code 52 assessment. Our £9.99 Automated Penalty Charge Appeal Service prepares and submits your challenge and handles your tribunal appeal.

Check Your PCN
Illustrated car approaching a road entrance with visible no-motor-vehicles signs
Illustrative diagram 619 scenario. The signs must communicate which vehicles are prohibited before they enter.

1. What does TfL Code 52 mean?

TfL Code 52 alleges failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle. Read the suffix and wording on the notice: the restriction may concern goods vehicles, motor vehicles or another defined class.

Contravention
Code 52: failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle
Issuing authority
Transport for London
Formal representation deadline
28 days beginning with service of the PCN.
Appeal route
TfL, then London Tribunals after a formal Notice of Rejection.
Penalty and discount
£160, reduced by 50% to £80 during the applicable discount period.
Appealing during the discount
TfL pauses the discount period when it receives your representation within that period. If rejected, the remaining discount period resumes from the point it was paused.
[1][2][4][9][10]

2. What must TfL establish?

Identify the actual prohibition sign, any weight figure, supplementary plate and permitted exceptions. Match the vehicle's relevant classification and weight basis to that restriction; the photograph alone may not establish every required characteristic.

TSRGD diagram 622.1A for goods vehicles exceeding the displayed maximum gross weight
The goods-vehicle variant uses diagram 622.1A. It is a different restriction from diagram 619; check the displayed weight and associated plate. Crown copyright.
  • The restriction applied to that road and time: check the start and end points, direction, operating hours and any relevant order commencement or amendment.
  • The vehicle fell within the prohibited class: for a goods-vehicle limit, establish the relevant maximum gross weight. An empty lorry is not necessarily below its permitted maximum, but the authority still needs evidence of the vehicle characteristic it alleges.
  • The restriction was adequately signed from your approach: compare the actual signs, plates and visibility with the order and prescribed or specially authorised signing.
  • The CCTV proves the relevant entry or use: check the registration, route, time and point of crossing, including whether the vehicle remained outside the restricted length.
  • The notice and owner liability are correct: examine the actual documents for a vehicle-identification, ownership, hire, service or material wording issue. Do not import private-parking keeper-liability rules.
[2][5][6][8][3][4][15]

3. Grounds and exemptions for a TfL Code 52 appeal

Access, permit and vehicle-class exceptions depend on the exact sign and order. This traffic restriction is separate from paying a tunnel, Congestion Charge or ULEZ charge.

  • Your vehicle did not fall within the prohibited class or weight category stated by the restriction.
  • An exemption shown on the sign or contained in the applicable order covered the journey.
  • The approach signs did not adequately convey the prohibition, or it did not apply at the recorded time.
  • The evidence identifies the wrong vehicle, route or restriction and does not establish the allegation.
  • If ownership, hire liability, payment or the amount demanded is disputed, explain the applicable statutory ground and attach the records supporting it.
[5][6][8][2][7][15]

4. How to challenge your PCN with TfL

Send your formal representation to TfL within 28 days beginning with service of the Code 52 PCN.

The initial 50% discount runs for 14 days beginning with the date of the PCN. TfL pauses the discount period when it receives your representation within that period. If rejected, the remaining discount period resumes from the point it was paused.

  1. Open TfL's PCN service below using your PCN number and vehicle registration.
  2. Explain the Code 52 ground you rely on. Include evidence of the prohibited vehicle class, sign wording and any applicable access or vehicle exemption.
  3. Submit in the name of the person or organisation on the notice, including written authorisation where a representative acts for them.
  4. For a postal representation, use Red routes, PO Box 335, Darlington DL1 9PU. Keep a copy and allow time for delivery.
  5. Save your completed submission, attachments and dated acknowledgement.
[13][11]

5. How long does TfL have to respond?

London Tribunals says the authority "should normally respond to representations within 3 months". Keep the acknowledgement showing when TfL received yours.

[11]

6. If TfL rejects your representation

Following a formal rejection, you have 28 days beginning with service to pay or register an appeal with London Tribunals. Use the appeal instructions and verification details supplied with TfL's decision.

[11]

7. Taking your TfL appeal to London Tribunals

Register with the Environment and Traffic Adjudicators at London Tribunals, the independent tribunal for this PCN. Set out your Code 52 grounds and include the notice, your representation and the supporting evidence.

If TfL contests the appeal, review its evidence pack against the prohibited vehicle class, sign wording and any applicable access or vehicle exemption. Respond to the tribunal's directions by the dates it gives you.

There is no fee to register an appeal. If refused, the full penalty is normally payable; the earlier discount does not automatically continue.

[11][12]

Other TfL notices and appeal routes

This contravention uses the Environment and Traffic Adjudicators route. TfL's ULEZ, LEZ, Congestion Charge and tunnel charging penalties use the separate Road User Charging Adjudicators route.

[16]

Tribunal examples relevant to Code 52

These London Tribunals decisions illustrate issues relevant to Code 52. They involve the authorities named below, not necessarily TfL. Use the reasoning that matches your evidence; these are not TfL-specific outcomes.

Stockwell Terrace: the missing map-based schedule left the restriction unproved

London Borough of LambethAppeal allowed

Case 2250437205 / 2025-12-31 / Adjudicator Chez Cotton

Chez Cotton allowed the appeal after finding that the evidence did not identify the relevant map-based restriction and did not resolve the concerns about the signs. A link to a general website did not fill the gap.

The appeal is allowed based on no case to answer.

Chez Cotton, case 2250437205
Read the case commentary

Royal Albert Way: the restriction was not clear before the driver committed to the route

London Borough of NewhamAppeal allowed

Case 2250386793 / 2025-12-30 / Adjudicator Anju Kaler

Anju Kaler allowed this appeal because the approach did not adequately warn of the restriction before entry. The advance signs referred to traffic enforcement rather than explaining what restriction lay ahead.

I find the signage inadequate to warn motorists driving on the main road of this “part time” restriction ahead.

Anju Kaler, case 2250386793
Read the case commentary

Kingswood Road: a garage visit did not establish an exception to the restriction

London Borough of LambethAppeal refused

Case 2250420450 / 2025-12-31 / Adjudicator Graeme Wallington

Graeme Wallington refused the appeal because the claimed need to reach a garage did not fall within an exception in the traffic order. The circumstances were mitigation, not a proven statutory ground.

The TMO does not grant any exemption for the circumstances the Appellant relies upon.

Graeme Wallington, case 2250420450
Read the case commentary

2025 TfL tribunal results: Prohibited vehicle types

78 of 242 recorded cases were allowed (32.2%).

TfL vehicle-type prohibitions, without a suffix split. Transport for London entries in the supplied 2025 ETA register analysis, grouped by allegation wording. Allowed includes uncontested appeals. Blank outcomes and refusals with a recommendation remain separate. These are tribunal cases, not all PCNs or initial representations.
Recorded outcomeCases
Allowed78
Refused164
Total242

Full Code 52 PCN Appeal Guide

Read the detailed legislation, signage requirements, exemptions and case analysis for this contravention.

Read the full Code 52 PCN Appeal Guide

Sources and references

  1. Standard contravention codes

    Linked contravention-code list: Code 52 and vehicle-specific suffixes. Read the complete wording on the notice.

  2. TSRGD 2016, Schedule 3

    Part 2 items 12 and 13, diagrams 619 and 622.1A; associated plates in Part 3; Part 4 lighting provisions; Part 5 direction 1. Supplied statutory PDF also checked.

  3. Traffic Signs Manual, Chapter 3 (2019)

    Sections 5.3, 5.7 and 5.17: motor vehicles, goods vehicles and sign siting. Guidance is distinct from mandatory legislation.

  4. Highway Code: traffic signs

    Prohibitory red circles, vehicle symbols and qualifying plates.

  5. Local Authorities' Traffic Orders Regulations 1996

    Regulation 18: information about the effect of an order and maintenance of signs.

  6. London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003

    Section 4 and Schedule 1: enforcement basis, representations, owner liability and rejection. Do not assume every Code 52 sign is a section 36 sign.

  7. London Tribunals: preparing your appeal

    Evidence and statutory grounds for the independent appeal.

  8. London Tribunals: registers of appeals

    Search the references below. Statistics from the supplied archive's Data sheet, decision year 2025 and vehicle-prohibition allegation.

  9. London-wide parking and traffic charges

    Current moving-traffic charge: £160, with the applicable 50% early-payment reduction. Borough increases took effect on 7 April 2025.

  10. England's 2022 charging guidelines

    Schedule 3: penalty levels and reduced payment outside London. Follow the applicable notice and jurisdiction.

  11. London Tribunals: moving-traffic enforcement process

    Representations within 28 days of service, normal three-month response and appeal after rejection.

  12. London Tribunals: preparing your appeal

    Registering an appeal, verification details and supporting evidence.

  13. TfL: challenge a Penalty Charge Notice

    Online and postal representations, authority to act and the discount-pause policy.

  14. TfL: red routes and penalty charges

    TfL's road network and the current traffic-enforcement penalty.

  15. TfL: rules of red routes

    Parking, loading, bus lanes, cycle lanes, yellow boxes and prohibited turns on TfL roads.

  16. London Tribunals: registers of appeals

    Separate ETA and RUCA appeal registers.

About Parking Mate UK

For a TfL Code 52 PCN, we focus on the prohibited vehicle class, sign wording and any applicable access or vehicle exemption. Our assessment combines your notice and evidence with relevant tribunal decisions.

Our 2025 TfL analysis of prohibited vehicle types covers 242 cases: 78 allowed and 164 refused. The results section explains the allegation group covered.

Parking Mate UK prepares and submits your challenge to TfL, tracks the response and handles your London Tribunals appeal. Send us your PCN for a free assessment and continue online or on WhatsApp.

Check Your PCN
Illustrated car approaching a road entrance with visible no-motor-vehicles signsExplore our appeal platform
By Parking Mate UK